The statutory role of depositaries and intermediaries as key enforcers of CGT collection at the transaction gate.
Registration, duties in share transfers, reporting obligations, and the compliance risk framework for intermediaries.
Practical compliance tools, accountability mechanisms, and exam-style questions for Lesson 11.
Zimbabwe’s Capital Gains Tax (CGT) system deliberately relies on intermediaries—especially depositaries—to enforce collection, documentary control, and reporting for disposals of specified assets (immovable property and marketable securities). The Capital Gains Tax Act [Chapter 23:01] (CGT Act) creates a statutory “withholding and reporting architecture” in Part IIIA, requiring depositaries to (i) withhold and remit capital gains withholding tax (CGWT) on qualifying payments, (ii) issue taxpayer certificates evidencing withholding, (iii) register as depositaries, and (iv) submit periodic returns/statement reporting to the Commissioner.
In the securities market, intermediaries such as stockbrokers, custodians, and the Central Securities Depository (CSD) shape how share transfers are executed and settled; however, the CGT Act’s concept of a “depositary” is functional and tax-specific—focused on whether a person holds and pays sale proceeds—rather than mirroring capital markets licensing categories.
Operationally, intermediaries integrate into CGT compliance
through:
- withholding and rapid remittance (generally within
3 working days) and certificate
issuance to sellers/payees;
- monthly depositary statements/returns and payment
reconciliation;
- TaRMS-era electronic clearance/certification
workflows, including verification features (authentication
codes and QR codes), which reduce fraud and support registrars and
market participants in validating compliance.
After completing this lesson, you should be able to:
A depositary is a legally defined intermediary in the CGT Act, generally including (among others) a conveyancer, legal practitioner, estate agent, and—critically for securities—any stockbroker or financial institution that holds the whole or part of the sale price and is required to pay it to/for the seller/payee.
The practical logic is straightforward: the depositary typically sits at the “cash-control point” (trust account, settlement account, escrow arrangement). Once the Act places a withholding and remittance duty on that party, the fiscus obtains a high-integrity collection channel that is harder to evade than self-reporting alone. This approach is reinforced by the CGT Act’s strict remittance timelines and direct personal liability for failures (covered later).
Core depositary functions under Part IIIA
(high-level):
When a depositary pays any amount held “as depositary” to or for the
credit of the seller in consequence of a sale/transfer of a specified
asset, the depositary must withhold CGWT from that amount and pay it to
the Commissioner by the statutory deadline (unless relieved by a
clearance certificate route).
Depositary certificate to the payee/seller:
Where tax is withheld, the depositary must give the payee a certificate
(in a Commissioner-approved form) containing key particulars (notably
the depositary’s and payee’s identifying information, particulars of the
property sold, and the CGWT withheld). This certificate is the seller’s
primary proof for downstream credit/refund processes and audit defense.
The CGT Act imposes a direct registration requirement: every person acting as a depositary “in the ordinary course of his business” must apply to the Commissioner for a registration certificate within 30 days of commencing that business (with transitional language for those already carrying on the business when the provision commenced).
What ZIMRA can require:
The application must be in writing and accompanied by information the
Commissioner may reasonably require to establish the applicant’s
identity, business location, and the nature/extent of depositary
activities.
Consequences of non-registration:
Contravening the registration duty is an offence punishable (on
conviction) by a fine (level three) or imprisonment (up to one month),
or both.
Practical note (risk governance):
Because the depositary is generally the “tax collection chokepoint,”
failure to be properly registered (and to operate compliant withholding
processes) is not merely administrative—it creates downstream
transaction risk (deal delays, refusal to proceed by other
professionals, and exposure to penalties in the event of failure to
withhold/remit).
Zimbabwe’s capital market uses a Central Securities Depository (CSD) system: investors open CSD accounts via stockbrokers or custodians; the CSD maintains electronic records of securities (dematerialization) and is operated by Chengetedzai Depository Company (CDC), integrated with the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (ZSE).
This matters for CGT because listed share transfers are typically processed through routes where a broker/custodian and settlement infrastructure touch both the security movement and the cash leg—creating clear candidates for “depositary” characterization under the CGT Act’s tax definition (especially where the broker/financial institution holds proceeds and pays out to the seller).
Listed securities (exchange/on-market model):
- Stockbroker / settlement-linked financial
institution: usually closest match to “depositary” because
it participates in settlement and payment flows for the seller; if it
holds and pays the sale proceeds, it falls within the statutory
depositary concept for marketable securities.
- CSD (CDC) and custodians: operationally move and
record securities; whether the CSD itself is a “depositary” for CGT
purposes depends on whether it holds and pays the price to/for the
seller. In most systems, cash settlement is broker/bank mediated; thus,
the broker/bank is typically the practical depositary for CGWT
execution.
Unlisted shares (private/off-market model):
- A depositary may exist (e.g., legal practitioner
holding proceeds in trust, an escrow agent, or a financial
institution holding the purchase price pending completion).
Where such a person holds and pays the price, the depositary withholding
obligations can attach.
- If there is no depositary, the CGT Act’s withholding
architecture “falls through” to the next nodes in the chain (agent, then
payee). This is why private M&A-style share transfers carry
heightened procedural risk if parties assume a broker-like withholding
mechanism exists when it does not.
Even where withholding has not occurred through a depositary mechanism, Zimbabwe’s CGT framework also uses registration gatekeeping: where CGT is not withheld, transfer registration of certain specified assets can be blocked unless a ZIMRA certificate confirming CGT has been paid is presented to the Registrar of Deeds or the person responsible for registering transfer of shares (in terms of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act reference in the CGT Act).
This is one reason intermediaries such as transfer secretaries and company officers often demand ZIMRA proof (clearance/certification) before recording a share transfer in private transactions.
The CGT Act imposes routine reporting duties on depositaries acting “in
the ordinary course of business” (expressly naming conveyancers, legal
practitioners, estate agents, stockbrokers, financial institutions, and
other depositaries). These depositaries must submit a
statement to the Commissioner on or before the
last day of every month (or at other permitted intervals),
covering:
- all sales of specified assets concluded/negotiated on behalf of
others, and
- all amounts of CGWT withheld during the preceding month.
A return submitted must be accompanied by the CGWT payable for the covered sales; and where a depositary (other than the listed “ordinary course” depositaries) pays CGWT, the payment must still be accompanied by a prescribed return.
These monthly reporting obligations coexist with the transaction-level rule that CGWT (once withheld) must generally be paid over by the depositary by the 3rd working day from payment to/for the seller (subject to allowed extensions). In other words, the monthly statement is not a substitute for timely remittance; it is a reconciliation and monitoring control.
Although Part IIIA focuses on withholding and reporting, ZIMRA’s operational CGT environment heavily relies on structured forms and documentation, notably the CGT1 return for remittance, which captures key transaction facts and includes flags relevant to special transaction types (e.g., whether a sale is under suspensive conditions, whether rollover is claimed, and whether exemptions such as “transfer between companies under the same control” are invoked).
flowchart TD
A[Intermediary begins acting as CGT "depositary" in ordinary course] --> B{Must register?}
B -->|Yes| C[Apply to Commissioner for depositary registration certificate\nwithin 30 days]
C --> D[Collect info/documents as reasonably required\n(identity, business place, nature/extent)]
D --> E[Receive registration certificate]
E --> F[Operate withholding controls: identify specified-asset sales\nand price-holding arrangements]
F --> G[Transaction occurs: pay/credit seller from funds held]
G --> H[Withhold CGWT and remit to ZIMRA\n(by statutory deadline)]
H --> I[Issue withholding certificate to payee/seller]
I --> J[Prepare monthly depositary statement/return]
J --> K[Submit statement by last day of month (or permitted interval)\n+ reconcile amounts withheld]
K --> F
This workflow is grounded in the depositary registration duty, the monthly return requirement, and the depositary’s withholding/certification obligations.
ZIMRA has formalized the move to electronic CGT clearance certification: electronic CGT clearance certificates contain security features (authentication code and QR code) and are verifiable through the TaRMS Self Service Portal, supporting intermediaries and counterparties in detecting fraudulent certificates.
Although manual CGT clearance certificate issuance was discontinued as a standard practice, ZIMRA later opened a limited window for manual certificates in exceptional cases tied to SAP legacy assessments/payments and certain older property cases, requiring proof of payment.
A depositary (or agent) that fails to withhold or pay CGWT as required
becomes personally liable for:
- the CGWT that should have been withheld, and
- an additional 15% of that CGWT (which the
Commissioner may waive in whole or part if satisfied the failure was not
intended to evade the Part).
A robust intermediary compliance framework should include:
- transaction intake checks identifying whether the asset is a
“specified asset” (immovable property or marketable security) and
whether the intermediary will hold sale proceeds (depositary trigger);
- workflow controls ensuring timely remittance after payment to/for the
seller and generation/archiving of withholding certificates;
- monthly reconciliation capacity to support the statutory
statement/return process;
- TaRMS certificate validation procedures (authentication code/QR
verification) to manage fraud risk;
- documented escalation procedures for cases where withholding is
claimed not to be required due to exemptions or special arrangements
(evidence-based position files, given audit risk).
Question
A legal practitioner holds purchase funds in trust for a private sale of
unlisted shares in a Zimbabwean company. The practitioner pays the
seller 100% of the sale consideration upon satisfaction of closing
conditions. Identify: (i) whether the practitioner is a “depositary,”
(ii) the immediate CGT-related obligations that follow, and (iii) the
periodic reporting obligation to ZIMRA.
Model answer
(i) The legal practitioner is a “depositary” if he/she holds the whole
or part of the price paid/payable and is required to pay it to/for the
seller in consequence of a sale of a marketable security; the CGT Act’s
depositary definition expressly includes legal practitioners and also
applies to marketable securities where the price is held and paid to the
seller.
(ii) Upon paying the seller from funds held as depositary, the
depositary must withhold CGWT (unless a clearance certificate route
applies), remit the tax by the statutory deadline, and issue a
withholding certificate to the payee/seller in the approved form showing
required particulars.
(iii) As a depositary acting in the ordinary course of business, the
practitioner must submit the statutory depositary statement/return by
the last day of the month (or permitted interval) covering relevant
sales and amounts of CGWT withheld, and the return must be accompanied
by CGWT payable for the reported sales.
Question
Explain why a transfer secretary (or company officer responsible for
share transfer registration) may refuse to register a private transfer
of shares if no ZIMRA certificate is provided, even when parties claim
the sale is complete.
Model answer
Where CGT is not withheld through Part IIIA mechanisms, the CGT Act
creates a registration control: no registration of acquisition of a
specified asset (including share transfers) may be done by the
share-transfer registering authority unless a ZIMRA-issued certificate
confirming CGT payable has been paid is submitted. This supports the
intermediary’s insistence on ZIMRA documentation before updating
registers.
https://www.zimra.co.zw/legislation/category/17-acts?download=4234%3Acapital-gains-tax-act-updated-to-1-dec-2024
https://www.zimra.co.zw/public-notices?download=4032%3Apublic-notice-56-of-2024-cgt-tax-clearance
https://www.zimra.co.zw/public-notices?download=4032%3Apublic-notice-56-of-2024-cgt-tax-clearance
https://seczim.co.zw/capital-markets-in-zimbabwe/
https://seczim.co.zw/capital-markets-in-zimbabwe/
https://www.zimra.co.zw/downloads/category/9-domestic-taxes?download=373%3Aform-cgt-1-return-for-remittance-of-capital-gains-tax
https://www.zimra.co.zw/public-notices?download=4386%3Apublic-notice-47-of-2025-issuance-of-manual-capital-gains-tax-certification-in-exceptional-cases
